From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samborsky v. Rothstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 4, 2020
20 CIVIL 298 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2020)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 298 (GHW)

09-04-2020

MICHAEL SAMBORSKY, Plaintiff, v. SARA ROTHSTEIN, doing business as 32BJ Benefit Funds, ALBERTA GALDRI, doing business as 32BJ Benefit Funds, and REGINE BRETON, doing business as 32BJ Benefit Funds, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 12, 2020, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted because the Fund's determination of Samborsky's eligibility for LTD benefits was not arbitrary and capricious; The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal; judgment is entered for Defendants; accordingly, ths case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 4, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Samborsky v. Rothstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 4, 2020
20 CIVIL 298 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Samborsky v. Rothstein

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SAMBORSKY, Plaintiff, v. SARA ROTHSTEIN, doing business as 32BJ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 4, 2020

Citations

20 CIVIL 298 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2020)