From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samaritano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 31, 1938
184 So. 927 (Fla. 1938)

Opinion

Opinion Filed October 31, 1938.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Duval County, Bayard B. Shields, Judge.

Charles M. Durrance, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General and Tyrus A. Norwood, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of manslaughter under an indictment charging murder in the first degree.

We have considered all questions and contentions presented by the plaintiff in error and find that each and all of them must be resolved against the plaintiff in error on authority of the former opinions and judgments of this Court and that no useful purpose may be served by now writing an extended opinion dealing with questions which have been heretofore fully answered and definitely determined.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment should be and is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and BROWN and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Samaritano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 31, 1938
184 So. 927 (Fla. 1938)
Case details for

Samaritano v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACK SAMARITANO, alias JAKE SAM MARITION, alias JAKE SAM SAMARITANO, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 31, 1938

Citations

184 So. 927 (Fla. 1938)
184 So. 927