From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sam Kim v. Ching-Ming Shen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 26, 2022
LA CV21-08437 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022)

Opinion

LA CV21-08437 JAK (AFMx)

01-26-2022

Sam Kim v. Ching-Ming Shen, et al.


PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than February 2, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). In light of the filing of the complaint date of October 25, 2021, proof(s) of service were due by January 25, 2022. An action may also be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sam Kim v. Ching-Ming Shen

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 26, 2022
LA CV21-08437 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Sam Kim v. Ching-Ming Shen

Case Details

Full title:Sam Kim v. Ching-Ming Shen, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 26, 2022

Citations

LA CV21-08437 JAK (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022)