From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saltzman v. City of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
CV 06-6150-VBF (OP) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)

Opinion


MICHAEL SALTZMAN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants. No. CV 06-6150-VBF (OP) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 27, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that the Judgment be entered: (1) approving and adopting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendant Baca's Motion to Dismiss the FAC without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and (3) directing the Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.


Summaries of

Saltzman v. City of Los Angeles

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
CV 06-6150-VBF (OP) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Saltzman v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SALTZMAN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

CV 06-6150-VBF (OP) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)