From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salmon v. Sunday

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 18, 1929
134 Misc. 475 (N.Y. App. Term 1929)

Opinion

June 18, 1929.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Bronx county.

James J. Mahoney, for the appellant.

Gould Gould, for the respondent.


It was error for the trial court to receive the unsworn testimony of three children in this case. ( Michel v. Semer, 205 A.D. 281.) The attempt by the court to affirm the witnesses did not cure the error. It having been determined that the children were incapable of understanding the nature of an oath, they were likewise incapable of affirmation.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, BIJUR, CALLAHAN and PETERS, JJ.


Summaries of

Salmon v. Sunday

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 18, 1929
134 Misc. 475 (N.Y. App. Term 1929)
Case details for

Salmon v. Sunday

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY SALMON, an Infant, by LOUIS SALMON, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1929

Citations

134 Misc. 475 (N.Y. App. Term 1929)
235 N.Y.S. 592

Citing Cases

Palmieri v. Salsimo Realty Co.

Competency depends on the capacity, judgment, understanding, and intelligence of the child, his ability to…

Palmieri v. Salsimo Realty Co.

Competency depends on the capacity, judgment, understanding, and intelligence of the child, his ability to…