From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sales v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Jan 27, 2011
No. 07-10-00433-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 07-10-00433-CV

January 27, 2011.

Appeal from the 84th District Court of Hutchinson County; No. 38,083; Honorable William D. Smith, Judge.

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.


ON MOTION TO DISMISS


Appellant, Chriscella Mariscal d/b/a Carmex Auto Sales, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because he no longer desires to pursue it. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal will prevent appellees from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellees to file a timely motion for rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.


Summaries of

Sales v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Jan 27, 2011
No. 07-10-00433-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Sales v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:CARMEX AUTO SALES, APPELLANT v. EUSEBIO RODRIGUEZ AND ESTELA CANEZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

Citations

No. 07-10-00433-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2011)