From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salerno v. Lansing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 16, 1945
269 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

May 16, 1945.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Dowling, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This is an action for false imprisonment. It was so stipulated upon the trial. The question is whether the Statute of Limitations began to run on July 19, 1940, when plaintiff was released from jail or on December 21, 1942, when the judgment of conviction was reversed. The gist of an action for false imprisonment is the unlawful detention. ( Schultz v. Greenwood Cemetery, 190 N.Y. 276, 278.) The plaintiff had two years from July 19, 1940, in which to commence his action for false imprisonment. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 50; Dusenbury v. Keiley, 85 N.Y. 383; Van Ingen v. Snyder, 24 Hun 81.) All concur. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in an action for damages for alleged false arrest.)


Summaries of

Salerno v. Lansing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 16, 1945
269 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Salerno v. Lansing

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SALERNO, Appellant, v. EVERT O. LANSING, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 16, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 810 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Tranberg v. County of Nassau

The period begins upon cessation of imprisonment, detention or restraint upon the person's physical liberty.…

Fischer v. Seamen's Church Institute of N.Y

In an action of this kind the Statute of Limitations obviously cannot operate until the detention is over. (…