From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salem v. Mott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 2007
43 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-01276.

August 7, 2007.

Appeal by CMS Monitoring, Inc., as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), dated January 19, 2007, as granted the motion of Lisa Salem for payment of legal fees and directed it to pay the sum of $18,000 to Farley Kessler, P.C.

Richman Levine, P.C. (Keith H. Richman of counsel), for appellant.

Farley Kessler, P.C. (Richard L. Farley of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

"It is the appellant's obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal" ( Cohen v Wallace Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 689, 689). Where, as here, meaningful appellate review of the Supreme Court's determination is made virtually impossible because of the incomplete nature of the record submitted, dismissal of the appeal is the appropriate disposition ( id.; see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Vargas, 288 AD2d 309, 310; Singh v Getty Petroleum Corp., 275 AD2d 740).


Summaries of

Salem v. Mott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 7, 2007
43 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Salem v. Mott

Case Details

Full title:LISA SALEM, Respondent, v. CARL MOTT, Defendant. (Matter No. 1.) In the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 7, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6353
839 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Rubio–Modica v. Modica

ORDERED that the order dated June 27, 2011, is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, without costs or…

Keita v. United Parcel Serv

The plaintiffs have failed to do so. It is the appellants' obligation to assemble a proper record on appeal (…