Opinion
Case No. 15-2209-CM Case No. 15-2285-CM Case No. 15-2289-CM Case No. 15-2307-CM Case No. 15-2309-CM Case No. 15-2310-CM Case No. 15-2311-CM Case No. 15-2312-CM Case No. 15-2313-CM Case No. 15-2320-CM Case No. 15-2321-CM Case No. 15-2588-CM Case No. 15-2590-CM Case No. 15-2607-CM Case No. 15-2608-CM Case No. 15-2609-CM Case No. 15-2622-CM Case No. 15-2627-CM Case No. 15-2637-CM Case No. 15-2638-CM Case No. 15-2641-CM Case No. 15-2644-CM Case No. 15-2645-CM Case No. 15-2647-CM Case No. 15-2648-CM Case No. 15-2653-CM Case No. 15-2654-CM
04-24-2015
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. COMPASS, SOUTHWEST CASE, and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. GRAY COUNTY KANSAS SHERIFF and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. GRAY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JEFF SHARP, and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HARMAN and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH SALEM and H.E. SALEM CORPORATION, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. SHAWNEE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. MEADE COUNTY JAIL and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. TIFFONY GASSELING, THE STATE OF KANSAS, and KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH E. SALEM, and H.E. SALEM CORPORATION, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. FRED BALTHAZOR, THE STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, R.J. COOK, and TIFFONY GASSELING, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. WALMART, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. JIM KRAMER and THE STATE OF KANSAS, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. DORALYN DAY and STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. STACY PYLE and NATHAN PYLE, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH WALDRON, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY VIEW BANK and BANCABILITY, Defendants. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. McDONALDS, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. SHAWNEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. CHEX SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. SKYLAR HESSON SALEM, Plaintiff, v. MERRIAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Plaintiff is not represented by counsel and the Report and Recommendation was mailed to him at his last known address on March 26, 2015. No objections to Magistrate Judge O'Hara's Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The court has reviewed the thorough Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge O'Hara. Based upon that review and the fact that no objection has been filed to it, the court accepts, adopts and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. As recommended by Magistrate Judge O'Hara, the court also imposes the following filing restrictions on plaintiff:
This was the same mailing address to which Magistrate Judge O'Hara's Notice of Hearing and Order to Show Cause were sent via certified mail, the receipt of which was confirmed on March 11, 2015. (See Docs. 15 & 16.)
Salem is prohibited from filing another complaint at this courthouse, unless he is represented by counsel.
Salem may only file a pro se complaint or document after he provides a notarized affidavit that verifies in paragraph form, with particularity, how the contemplated complaint entitles him to relief. The affidavit must provide notice of the restriction and must provide a copy of the proposed complaint as an exhibit.
Upon compliance with the above stated requirements, the court will review the affidavit and the proposed filing to determine whether it should be accepted for filing. If Salem attempts to file any complaint or document that fails to comply with these restrictions, the Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept and/or file the document.
Accordingly, and after reviewing the file de novo, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on March 26, 2015 is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. All of plaintiff's cases are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is also restricted from filing new complaint(s), unless the conditions set forth in this order have been met.
These cases are now closed.
Dated this 24th day of April, 2015, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Carlos Murguia
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States District Judge