From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saldana v. Paramo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 6, 2015
CV 14-4643-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

          Enrique Ismael Saldana, Petitioner, Pro se, San Diego, CA.

          Daniel Paramo, Warden, Respondent: Toni R Johns Estaville, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JAMES V. SELNA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Under the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Saldana v. Paramo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 6, 2015
CV 14-4643-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Saldana v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUE ISMAEL SALDANA, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

CV 14-4643-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)