From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salcido v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2020
NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2020)

Opinion

NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E)

09-08-2020

MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO, Plaintiff, v. R.C. JOHNSON, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint and the action without leave to amend and with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment of this date on Plaintiff.

DATED: September 8, 2020.

/s/_________

OTIS D. WRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Salcido v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2020
NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Salcido v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO, Plaintiff, v. R.C. JOHNSON, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2020

Citations

NO. CV 19-9259-ODW(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2020)