From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Salazar

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Aug 15, 2022
No. C092727 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2022)

Opinion

C092727

08-15-2022

ISRAEL C. SALAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICARDO SALAZAR, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Respondent


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

(Super. Ct. No. 34-2018-00246743-PR-TR-FRC)

HOCH, J.

In a signed order filed on December 6, 2019, the trial court denied appellant Israel C. Salazar's petition challenging the validity of a living trust. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that order on August 25, 2020.

Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 180 days after the trial court's appealable order was filed, the notice of appeal is untimely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1)(C), (e).) Because we have no jurisdiction to consider this untimely appeal, we dismiss it on our own motion. (See In re G.C. (2020) 8 Cal.5th 1119, 1127; Faunce v. Cate (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 166, 170.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed. Respondent Ricardo Salazar is awarded his costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1), (2).)

WE CONCUR: DUARTE, ACTING P. J., EARL, J.


Summaries of

Salazar v. Salazar

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Aug 15, 2022
No. C092727 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Salazar v. Salazar

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL C. SALAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICARDO SALAZAR, as…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Aug 15, 2022

Citations

No. C092727 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2022)