From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Ospina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 1998
253 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 31, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with one bill of costs to the Travis defendants payable by the plaintiff and the defendant Roberta D. Green.

The plaintiff sustained injuries while a passenger in a vehicle driven by the defendant Flor E. Ospina which crossed over into the opposing lane of traffic, striking a vehicle driven by the defendant Mary N. Travis and owned by the defendant Yolanda Travis.

The plaintiff contends that Mary N. Travis was negligent in operating her vehicle because she failed to brake, sound the horn, or reduce her speed to avoid the accident. However, Mary N. Travis was not obligated to anticipate that a car traveling in the opposite direction would cross over into her lane ( see, Palmer v. Palmer, 31 A.D.2d 876, affd 27 N.Y.2d 945; Gooch v. Shapiro, 7 A.D.2d 307, affd 8 N.Y.2d 1088). Once it was established that the head-on collision was caused by the car driven by Ospina crossing into Mary N. Travis' lane of travel, it was incumbent upon the other parties to submit evidence in admissible form that her negligence contributed to the accident ( see, Eisenbach v. Rogers, 158 A.D.2d 792, 793). Mere speculation that she may have failed to take some unspecified measures to avoid the accident or in some other way contributed to the occurrence of the accident is insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; Bavaro v. Martel, 197 A.D.2d 813; Roman v. Vargas, 182 A.D.2d 543).

Accordingly, Mary N. Travis and Yolanda Travis were properly granted summary judgment.

Thompson, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salazar v. Ospina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 31, 1998
253 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Salazar v. Ospina

Case Details

Full title:JAIR SALAZAR, Appellant-Respondent, v. FLOR E. OSPINA, Defendant, ROBERTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 31, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 166

Citing Cases

Sirico v. Beukelaer

The affirmation of the plaintiff's attorney lacked probative weight and could not raise a triable issue of…

Pisciotto v. LaRocque

The same is true of the suggestion by the attorney for the LaRocques that if Damiano had applied his brakes…