From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salaam v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1996
226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 9, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Hansel McGee, J.


Legally sufficient evidence of defendants' constructive notice of a dangerous condition was provided by the uncontroverted testimony at trial that the puddle in which plaintiffs slipped was 2 1/2 feet by 2 1/2 feet and was dirty with numerous footprints, both wet and dry, leading out of it in all directions ( see, Negri v. Stop Shop, 65 N.Y.2d 625; Catanzaro v. King Kullen Grocery Co., 194 A.D.2d 584).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Salaam v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1996
226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Salaam v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ISIAH SALAAM, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, FATIMA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

Nadal v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

While a reasonable jury could conclude that the banana was smashed and dirty because Plaintiff stepped on it,…

LaRosa v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, Inc.

The defendant failed to meet its initial burden of showing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (…