Opinion
January, 1914.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Howard and Woodward, JJ., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Sakofsky v. Camden Fire Insurance Association
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Summaries of
Sakofsky v. Camden Fire Insurance Association
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for
Sakofsky v. Camden Fire Insurance Association
Case Details
Full title:Karl Sakofsky, Respondent, v. The Camden Fire Insurance Association…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1914
Citations
161 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)