From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saintillus v. United States Supreme Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 11, 2023
2:23-cv-00776 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00776 KJM AC P

07-11-2023

CHALONER SAINTILLUS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 4, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 9.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations issued May 4, 2023 (ECF No. 4), are ADOPTED in full;
2. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, and
3. This case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Saintillus v. United States Supreme Court

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 11, 2023
2:23-cv-00776 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Saintillus v. United States Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:CHALONER SAINTILLUS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 11, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00776 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2023)