From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sailer v. State

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-40180.

March 7, 2008.

Savannah Lina Robinson, Danbury, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Christopher Andrew Lotz, David R. Stephens, Lindow Treat, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 7:02-CV-247.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


John and Marilyn Sailer appeal from the district court's ruling on summary judgment that their Texas homeowner's policy does not provide coverage for mold damage to their dwelling that arises from an accidental discharge of water. The Sailers argue that the mold exclusion found in their policy is not applicable because of an "exclusion repeal" provision. They rely on the Texas Supreme Court's decision in Balandran v. Safeco his. Co. of Am., 972 S.W.2d 738 (Tex. 1998). We have previously addressed this identical issue, concluding that Balandran is inapplicable and that mold damage to the dwelling is not covered under the policy language at issue here. See Carrizales v. State Farm Lloyds, 518 F.3d 343, 345-48 (5th Cir. 2008). The Sailers' arguments are thus foreclosed by our precedent.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sailer v. State

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Sailer v. State

Case Details

Full title:John SAILER; Marilyn Sailer, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. STATE FARM LLOYDS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2008

Citations

268 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Norris v. PNC Bank

; Munguia v. State Farm Lloyds, No. CV M-02-115-H, 2006 WL 8448823, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2006), aff'd…