From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saiia v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 5, 1993

Appeal from the Court of Claims, McMahon, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, judgment granted in favor of claimant and matter remitted to Court of Claims for a trial on damages only in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although it found that the State was negligent in failing to keep stairs at Roswell Park Memorial Institute in proper repair, the Court of Claims, following a bifurcated trial, dismissed the claim based upon its determination that claimant's inattentiveness and failure to observe the obvious condition was the superseding proximate cause of her injuries. We conclude that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support such a determination (see, Denkensohn v Davenport, 75 N.Y.2d 25, 36; Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315, rearg denied 52 N.Y.2d 784). Inasmuch as claimant appeals from a judgment rendered following a bench trial, we are empowered to grant the judgment that should have been granted, including the apportionment of liability (see, Don Vito v State of New York, 182 A.D.2d 1070, 1071). Thus, we reverse the judgment, find for the claimant and apportion liability as 50% against the State and 50% against the claimant and remit the matter for a trial on the issue of damages only.


Summaries of

Saiia v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 5, 1993
190 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Saiia v. State

Case Details

Full title:F. ARMAND SAIIA, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

White v. Gabrielli

The defendant asserts that he is not negligent, as a matter of law, because the wheel stop was clearly…

Tuttle v. State

"The State, as a landowner, has a duty to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance and control of its…