From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saiia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2004
3 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2700N.

Decided January 15, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered July 26, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by an icy condition in a playground owned and operated by defendant City, denied plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to produce a further witness for examination before trial and further documents for discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the facts, to direct defendant to produce for deposition Crew Chief Kelly, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Ira S. Slavit, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Cheryl Payer, for Defendant-Respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant should produce Crew Chief Kelly, who, according to the witness that defendant did produce, was probably present at the playground supervising snow removal on both the day before and day of the accident. While the witness produced by defendant was able to explain defendant's records and, on the basis thereof, generally describe the snow removal techniques likely used in the playground where plaintiff fell, his lack of personal knowledge left open many material questions, including the condition of the path where plaintiff fell at the time defendant's employees last undertook snow removal prior to the accident, the equipment they used and whether it was then snowing ( see Tolliver v. New York City Hous. Auth., 225 A.D.2d 412; Tucciarone v. Windsor Owners Corp., 306 A.D.2d 162). Plaintiff's motion was properly denied in all other respects. She has received the Crew Chief's activity logs for the four-day period immediately prior to the accident, including the day of the accident. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate how the logs, which go back for a period of 17 days before the accident, would be relevant or useful ( see Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406-407).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Saiia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2004
3 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Saiia v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE SAIIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 12

Citing Cases

Caporale v. 860 River LLC

If third party defendant responded to the shaft door's malfunction that injured plaintiff, however, she is…

Gray v. Stahl

Given the January 17, 2017 and March 7, 2017 stipulations providing for post-note of issue discovery, there…