From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sage v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Jan 7, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-408 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-408

01-07-2014

GORDON W. SAGE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution, Respondent.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #2), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is a "second or successive" petition within the meaning of the AEDPA and is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a determination of whether Petitioner may proceed.

__________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sage v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Jan 7, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-408 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Sage v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:GORDON W. SAGE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, London Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Jan 7, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-408 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2014)