From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sagar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 12, 1999
727 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-3140

Opinion filed March 12, 1999

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

Lisa T. Munyon, Orlando, for Petitioner. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida.

Kathleen Flammia, Orlando, for Respondent, Deryck Katwaroo.

Andrea Black, Orlando, for Respondent, Shastri Arron Harnanan.


Petitioner Rishan Sagar, defendant below, seeks certiorari review of two circuit court orders compelling defense experts, appointed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.216(a), to provide their notes, records, communications, opinions, reports and data to the co-defendants.

Petitioner also seeks review of an oral order granting the state's ore tenus motion for production, but the oral order has not bee rendered and therefore is not reviewable. See In re: Guardianship of A.P., 644 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

Rule 3.216(a) expressly states that the experts appointed under this subsection shall only report to the attorney for the defendant and matters related to the experts shall fall under the lawyer-client privilege. The privilege is only waived if the defendant actually calls the confidential expert to testify. See Sanders v. State, 707 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1998); Morgan v. State, 639 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1994); Lovette v. State, 636 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 1994). The fact that the defendant lists the expert as a potential witness is not sufficient to waive the privilege. See Ursry v. State, 428 So.2d 713 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 438 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1983). Although petitioner provided copies of the confidential experts' reports, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.216(g), this limited disclosure is not sufficient to waive the privilege. Therefore, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the trial court's orders are quashed.

PETITION GRANTED AND ORDERS QUASHED.

SHARP, W. and GOSHORN, JJ. concur.


Summaries of

Sagar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 12, 1999
727 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Sagar v. State

Case Details

Full title:RISHAN SAGAR, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 12, 1999

Citations

727 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Knowles v. State

Where the defendant calls the confidential expert to testify, the general rule, as previously noted,…