From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safena v. Giuliano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 2008
53 A.D.3d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-11521.

July 29, 2008.

In an action, inter alia, to compel the release of money from an escrow account, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated September 15, 2005, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the complaint, with leave to renew after joinder of necessary parties.

Ronald Cohen, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

David Zaslavsky, PLLC, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Lifson, Covello and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court, which correctly concluded that certain nonparties were necessary parties to the action ( see CPLR 1001 [a]; cf. Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., Hudson City School Dist., 35 NY2d 272, 282), properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, with leave to renew upon the nonparties' joinder ( see Salomon Bros. Realty Corp. v Alvarez, 22 AD3d 482).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is beyond the scope of our review ( see CPLR 5515; Cardinal Holdings v Chandre Corp., 302 AD2d 550, 551).


Summaries of

Safena v. Giuliano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 29, 2008
53 A.D.3d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Safena v. Giuliano

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SAFENA, Appellant, v. GUY G. GIULIANO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 29, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6443
860 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Jerusalem Avenue Taxpayer, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

It would also affect the amount of insurance coverage available at that Best Yet location. In addition, as…