From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safari Whirlpool v. Continental Indus. Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 10, 1997.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant Continental Industrial Center appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated January 29, 1996, which granted the Plaintiff's motion to preclude it, upon the trial of the action, from presenting any testimony concerning the allegations contained in the third, fourth, and seventh affirmative defenses asserted in its answer.

Before: Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the defendant Continental Industrial Center failed to comply with the court's conditional order of preclusion requiring it to provide a bill of particulars relating to certain of its affirmative defenses, the Supreme Court did not improvidently grant a final order precluding the defendant from offering evidence in support of those defenses ( see, CPLR 3042 [c]; L 1962, ch 308; Half Hollow Hills Cent. School Dist. v Costello, 100 AD2d 505).


Summaries of

Safari Whirlpool v. Continental Indus. Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Safari Whirlpool v. Continental Indus. Center

Case Details

Full title:SAFARI WHIRLPOOL, INC., Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL INDUSTRIAL CENTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 418