From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sadowsky v. Levine

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 2, 1963
151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963)

Opinion

No. 31757.

February 13, 1963. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1963.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Green Hastings and Carr Warren, Miami, for petitioners.

Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka Carlton, Miami, for respondents.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C.J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., dissent.


I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

O'CONNELL, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Sadowsky v. Levine

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 2, 1963
151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963)
Case details for

Sadowsky v. Levine

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN SADOWSKY AND SIDNEY SADOWSKY, PETITIONERS, v. BENJAMIN LEVINE AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 2, 1963

Citations

151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963)

Citing Cases

Haynes v. Lloyd

See also W. Prosser W. Keeton, The Law of Torts § 61 p. 426 (5th Ed. 1984); 5 F. Harper, F. James O. Gray,…