From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sachse v. Metro P.T., P.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 10, 2001
286 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued June 22, 2001.

September 10, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered May 9, 2000, which, upon their default in appearing or answering, and upon their appearance at an inquest on the issue of damages, finding that the plaintiff Krista Sachse had sustained damages of $400,000 for past pain and suffering and $400,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $800,000.

LaSorsa Beneventano, White Plains, N.Y. (Gregory M. LaSorsa of counsel), for appellants.

Napoli, Kaiser Associates (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Paul J. Napoli and Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P. MYRIAM J. ALTMAN SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and a new inquest is granted on the issue of damages only, unless within 30 days after service upon Desiree Sachse of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, she shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, a written stipulation consenting to decrease the verdict from the total amount of $800,000 to $400,000 ($250,000 for past pain and suffering and $150,000 for future pain and suffering) and the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly; in the event that Desiree Sachse so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The award of damages materially deviates from reasonable compensation to the extent indicated (see, CPLR 5501[c]). Accordingly, we have directed a new trial on the issue of damages unless Desiree Sachse stipulates to a reduction thereof. In the event that a new trial is held, the resulting damages award should be itemized pursuant to CPLR 4111(f).

The defendants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

Sachse v. Metro P.T., P.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 10, 2001
286 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Sachse v. Metro P.T., P.C

Case Details

Full title:KRISTA SACHSE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. METRO P.T., P.C., ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 10, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Biejanov v. Guttman

Under the facts of this case, the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering, as reduced, if…