From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sabbats v. Clarke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Nov 21, 2022
CIVIL 3:21cv780 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21cv780 (DJN)

11-21-2022

RACHEL HALLOWS SABBATS, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID J. NOVAK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. To state a viable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that a person acting under color of state law deprived him or her of a constitutional right or of a right conferred by a law of the United States. See Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley, 145 F.3d 653, 658 (4th Cir. 1998) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 1983). Plaintiffs current allegations fail to identify the particular constitutional right that each Defendant's conduct violated or provide each Defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which his or her liability rests. See BellAtl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (explaining that a complaint must “give the defendant fair notice of what the ... claim is and the grounds upon which it rests”).

Accordingly, by Memorandum Order entered on July 20, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof. (ECF No. 30.) The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to submit a particularized complaint would result in the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff did not comply with the July 20, 2022, Memorandum Order. Nevertheless, by Memorandum Order entered on October 5, 2022, the Court provided Plaintiff with a second opportunity to file a particularized complaint. (ECF No. 32.) The Court once again warned Plaintiff that failure to submit a particularized complaint within thirty (30) days of entry thereof would result in dismissal of the action.

More than thirty (30) days have elapsed since the entry of the October 5, 2022, Memorandum Order. Plaintiff has failed to submit a particularized complaint or otherwise respond to the October 5, 2022, Memorandum Order. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Let the Clerk file a copy of the Memorandum Opinion electronically and send a copy to Plaintiff.

An appropriate Final Order shall issue.


Summaries of

Sabbats v. Clarke

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Nov 21, 2022
CIVIL 3:21cv780 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Sabbats v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL HALLOWS SABBATS, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 3:21cv780 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2022)