From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sabaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
May 13, 2014
Case No. 13-cv-14614 (E.D. Mich. May. 13, 2014)

Summary

adopting recommendation to dismiss a pro se plaintiff's complaint where the plaintiff failed to respond to orders to show cause

Summary of this case from Harris v. Sanborn

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-14614

05-13-2014

ANDREW JAMES SABAUGH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

Magistrate Judge David R. Grand


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

On November 6, 2013, Plaintiff Andrew Sabaugh, proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his claim for benefits.

On January 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand directed Sabaugh to file his motion for summary judgment February 24, 2014. Sabaugh did not do so. On February 26, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Sabaugh to inform the Court why it should not recommend dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute. Sabaugh did not respond. On March 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Grand gave Sabaugh "one final opportunity" to file his motion for summary judgment by April 11, 2014. Sabaugh did not do so. On April 22, 2014, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a report recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

__________

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon Andrew James Sabaugh at 1079 Winchester Avenue, Lincoln Park, MI 48146 by first class U.S. mail on May 13, 2014.

__________

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Sabaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
May 13, 2014
Case No. 13-cv-14614 (E.D. Mich. May. 13, 2014)

adopting recommendation to dismiss a pro se plaintiff's complaint where the plaintiff failed to respond to orders to show cause

Summary of this case from Harris v. Sanborn

adopting recommendation to dismiss a pro se plaintiff's complaint where the plaintiff failed to respond to orders to show cause

Summary of this case from Echols v. Wingate Mgmt., Inc.
Case details for

Sabaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW JAMES SABAUGH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-14614 (E.D. Mich. May. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Sanborn

Id. Courts in this district regularly dismiss complaints lodged by pro se plaintiffs who fail to abide by…

Echols v. Wingate Mgmt., Inc.

Id. Courts in this district regularly dismiss complaints lodged by pro se plaintiffs who fail to abide by…