From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saavedra v. CHW Grp., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 15, 2016
504 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

WD 79377

11-15-2016

John and Cynthia SAAVEDRA, Respondents, v. CHW GROUP, INC., Appellant.

Attorneys: Casey Symonds, Lee's Summit, MO Counsel for Appellant Attorneys: John Witten, Leawood, KS Counsel for Respondents


Attorneys: Casey Symonds, Lee's Summit, MO Counsel for Appellant

Attorneys: John Witten, Leawood, KS Counsel for Respondents

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Cynthia L. Martin, and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

CHW Group, Inc. (CHW) appeals a judgment denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

The Saavedras has also moved for an award of attorney's fees on appeal under MMPA section 407.025. "The legislature intended that in any action filed under the MMPA the trial court within its discretion may order an ‘injunction or other equitable relief and reasonable attorney's fees.’ " Berry v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 397 S.W.3d 425, 433 (Mo. banc 2013). Thus, although this Court has the authority to grant an amount of attorney's fees on appeal, we believe "in most cases that the trial court is better equipped to hear evidence and argument on the issue and determine the reasonableness of the fee requested." Id. Therefore, we grant the motion for attorney's fees and remand this case to the trial court on this issue, requiring it to determine the reasonableness of the Saavedras' request for attorney's fees on appeal.
--------


Summaries of

Saavedra v. CHW Grp., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 15, 2016
504 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Saavedra v. CHW Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:John and Cynthia SAAVEDRA, Respondents, v. CHW GROUP, INC., Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 15, 2016

Citations

504 S.W.3d 141 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Ostermeier v. Prime Props. Invs. Inc.

" ‘The legislature intended that in any action filed under the MMPA the trial court within its discretion may…