From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saal v. Claridge Hotel & Casino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1989
152 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 10, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is granted, the cross motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, shall deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries.

The plaintiff was and still is a resident of Suffolk County and her decedent was a resident of Suffolk County. The accident which underlies this lawsuit occurred in Atlantic City, New Jersey, and none of the named defendants are residents of Queens County. The basis for the plaintiff's selection of Queens County as the place of trial was an office allegedly maintained by the defendant Claridge Hotel and Casino at the Marine Air Terminal, La Guardia Airport, Queens, New York. However, that corporation's certificate of incorporation designated New York County as its principal place of business. The law is well established that the sole legal residence of a corporation for venue purposes is the county designated in its certificate of incorporation. Thus, the plaintiff selected an improper venue and thereby forfeited her rights to select the place of venue (Papadakis v Command Bus Co., 91 A.D.2d 657). Further, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice will be furthered by retaining venue in Queens County. Accordingly, venue should be changed to Suffolk County, which is a proper county for venue purposes and is the place which was selected for trial by the appellant. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Saal v. Claridge Hotel & Casino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1989
152 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Saal v. Claridge Hotel & Casino

Case Details

Full title:LINDA SAAL, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of MICHAEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
543 N.Y.S.2d 521

Citing Cases

Weinstein v. Abraham and Strauss

The summons stated that the basis of venue was the defendant's "main office". However, "the sole legal…

TENER CONSULTING SERV. v. FSA MAIN ST., LLC

On a motion to change venue pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511, it is defendant's burden to establish that…