From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S. Nurseries v. Solis

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 11, 2010
No. 13-09-00664-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00664-CV

Delivered and filed February 11, 2010.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants, Southern Nurseries, Inc. and Kathy Garfield, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. C-290-09-B. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that there is no longer an issue in controversy. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.


Summaries of

S. Nurseries v. Solis

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Feb 11, 2010
No. 13-09-00664-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)
Case details for

S. Nurseries v. Solis

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN NURSERIES, INC. AND KATHY GARFIELD, Appellants, v. MARIA…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

No. 13-09-00664-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2010)