From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Props.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 11, 2024
5:23-cv-05072 NC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-05072 NC

07-11-2024

VALENTINA RYSS, Plaintiff, v. LOBAN MAPLE LEAF PROPERTIES, LP, and others, Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL RE: ECF 17

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Props.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 11, 2024
5:23-cv-05072 NC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Props.

Case Details

Full title:VALENTINA RYSS, Plaintiff, v. LOBAN MAPLE LEAF PROPERTIES, LP, and others…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 11, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-05072 NC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2024)