Ruzak v. USAA Ins. Agency, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Ruzak v. USAA Ins. Agency Inc.

    No. 288053 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2011)

    However, on reconsideration, the Supreme Court ruled that the law of the case doctrine had not precluded consideration of the following two specific arguments: "(a) the renewal rule does not apply when a new insurance policy is issued pursuant to an insured's move to a new state; and (b) the renewal rule does not apply where the last change in the insurance policy did not produce a decrease in coverage, but an increase." Ruzak v USAA Ins Agency, Inc, 489 Mich 865; 795 NW2d 154 (2011). The Court remanded the case to us for consideration of these two arguments, with leave being denied in all other respects.