However, on reconsideration, the Supreme Court ruled that the law of the case doctrine had not precluded consideration of the following two specific arguments: "(a) the renewal rule does not apply when a new insurance policy is issued pursuant to an insured's move to a new state; and (b) the renewal rule does not apply where the last change in the insurance policy did not produce a decrease in coverage, but an increase." Ruzak v USAA Ins Agency, Inc, 489 Mich 865; 795 NW2d 154 (2011). The Court remanded the case to us for consideration of these two arguments, with leave being denied in all other respects.