Opinion
Argued March 6, 1891
Decided March 20, 1891
L.A. Fuller for appellant.
John E. Eustis for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rutty v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1891
126 N.Y. 639 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Rutty v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1891
126 N.Y. 639 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Rutty v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Co.
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM H. RUTTY, Respondent, v . CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 20, 1891
Citations
126 N.Y. 639 (N.Y. 1891)
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1014
Citing Cases
Morowsky v. Rohrig
There was no legal evidence warranting the finding that there was any special agreement made on December 5,…