From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruttler v. PSE&G

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
May 29, 2020
DOCKET NO. A-3089-18T1 (App. Div. May. 29, 2020)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-3089-18T1

05-29-2020

JOHN RUTTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PSE&G, Defendant-Respondent, and VERIZON, BUCKEYE PA TERMINAL, LLC, and COLONIAL PIPELINE, Defendants.

Levinson Axelrod, PA, attorneys for appellant (Adam L. Rothenberg, on the briefs). PSE&G Services Corporation, attorneys for respondent (Peter L. Agostini and Natalie F. Dallavalle, on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. Before Judges Messano and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-2731-17. Levinson Axelrod, PA, attorneys for appellant (Adam L. Rothenberg, on the briefs). PSE&G Services Corporation, attorneys for respondent (Peter L. Agostini and Natalie F. Dallavalle, on the brief). PER CURIAM

We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has been amicably adjusted, and the parties have stipulated to dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

Ruttler v. PSE&G

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
May 29, 2020
DOCKET NO. A-3089-18T1 (App. Div. May. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Ruttler v. PSE&G

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RUTTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PSE&G, Defendant-Respondent, and…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: May 29, 2020

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-3089-18T1 (App. Div. May. 29, 2020)