From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruther v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2017
No. 16-2067 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-2067

02-02-2017

L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00996-LMB-MSN) Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court's order denying his motion to stay. The district court denied relief because Ruther's underlying civil action was no longer pending before the court and Ruther offered no valid basis for a stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ruther leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-00996-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19 & entered Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Ruther v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2017
No. 16-2067 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Ruther v. United States

Case Details

Full title:L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

No. 16-2067 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Ruther v. United States

I recommend that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has a…