From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruth v. Statmaster Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 25, 1968
214 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37664.

September 25, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Law Office of David Goldman, Miami, for petitioner.

Kates Ress, Roland Gomez, North Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 3, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorneys' fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ruth v. Statmaster Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 25, 1968
214 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Ruth v. Statmaster Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RUTH, PETITIONER, v. STATMASTER CORPORATION ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 25, 1968

Citations

214 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1968)