From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruth v. Comcast Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. 3:04 CV 0332 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04 CV 0332.

February 10, 2006


AGREED ORDER


In accordance with the issues raised by the parties and the Court at the telephone status conference held on January 20, 2006, the Court hereby orders as follows:

1. On or before February 20, 2006, Defendant shall deliver to the offices of Plaintiff's counsel, a check representing all back benefits and owing to Plaintiff from October, 2001 through and including February, 2006, at the rate of $219.25 per month, for a total of) or $11,620.25. If Defendant fails to make this required payment contempt proceedings may result.

2. Beginning March 1, 2006 Defendant shall pay Plaintiff her regular monthly benefit of $219.25 per month in accordance with the applicable plan documents, based upon the conclusion that Plaintiff has been and continues to be disabled and therefore eligible for benefits in accordance with applicable plan documents.

3. Plaintiff's counsel has until February 20, 2006 to file a motion seeking payment of interest and attorneys' fees in connection with this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ruth v. Comcast Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Feb 10, 2006
Case No. 3:04 CV 0332 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Ruth v. Comcast Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER RUTH, Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CORPORATION aka Comcast Business…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:04 CV 0332 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Laraway v. Ameritech Sickness Benefit Plan

Because the Plan subsequently corrected this error, Laraway cannot claim prejudice because the Court now has…

COMMUNITIES FOR EQUITY v. MICHIGAN HIGH S. ATHL. ASS

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206(c), since a conflict exists regarding what spelling is appropriate,…