From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruth Bacardi & Co. v. Baoulos

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 10, 2019
NO. 01-18-00869-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 01-18-00869-CV

12-10-2019

RUTH BACARDI & COMPANY, Appellant v. NAJIB BAOULOS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2016-44867

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ruth Bacardi & Company, has neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellee subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. More than ten days have passed and appellant failed to respond to the motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower.


Summaries of

Ruth Bacardi & Co. v. Baoulos

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 10, 2019
NO. 01-18-00869-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Ruth Bacardi & Co. v. Baoulos

Case Details

Full title:RUTH BACARDI & COMPANY, Appellant v. NAJIB BAOULOS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

NO. 01-18-00869-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 10, 2019)