From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruston v. Continental Motel

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Feb 28, 2003
No. 3:02-CV-2349-N (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2003)

Opinion

No. 3:02-CV-2349-N

February 28, 2003


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Court hereby denies plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. As long as plaintiff remains a prisoner within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g), he may not proceed with the instant action or any other civil action without prepayment of the filing fee or a showing of imminent danger of serious physical injury. By separate judgment the Court will formally dismiss plaintiff's complaint.

JUDGMENT

This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered,

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:

1. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

2. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment and the Order Accepting the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Ruston v. Continental Motel

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Feb 28, 2003
No. 3:02-CV-2349-N (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2003)
Case details for

Ruston v. Continental Motel

Case Details

Full title:LESTER JON RUSTON, ID # 02065558, Plaintiff, vs. CONTINENTAL MOTEL, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Feb 28, 2003

Citations

No. 3:02-CV-2349-N (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2003)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.

III. IMMINENT DANGERA plaintiff barred by three strikes must show imminent danger at the time that he seeks…

Quick v. Castanon

The Fifth Circuit has held that a plaintiff barred by three strikes must show "imminent danger at the time…