From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russian Collections, Ltd. v. Melamid

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 17, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-300.

November 17, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Russian Collections, Ltd.'s ("RC") Motion for Discovery Sanctions. (No. 20). On May 14, 2009, RC filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. (No. 10). On June 1, 2009, after Defendant Alexander Melamid failed to respond to interrogatory requests and requests for production of documents, RC requested an order: "(1) directing that RC is entitled to a preliminary injunction because it has established: (a) a likelihood of success on the merits; and (b) irreparable injury to it absent the granting of the preliminary injunction; and (2) prohibiting Melamid from contesting either RC's likelihood of success on the merits or that RC will be irreparably harmed absent the granting of the preliminary injunction." In addition, RC requested that Melamid be required to pay attorneys fees. On July 1, 2009, the Court denied RC's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (No. 32). As a result, the Motion for Discovery Sanctions is now MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Russian Collections, Ltd. v. Melamid

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 17, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Russian Collections, Ltd. v. Melamid

Case Details

Full title:RUSSIAN COLLECTIONS, LTD. Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER MELAMID, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-300 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 17, 2009)