From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 10, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-165

11-10-2015

CHRISTOPHER M. RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, North Central Correctional Complex, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Second Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 21), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Second Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. November 10, 2015.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Russell v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 10, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Russell v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER M. RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, North Central Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-165 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2015)