Opinion
Nos. 12-08-00495-CR, 12-08-00496-CR
Opinion delivered January 7, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appealed from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Smith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct. Nos. 002-84608-07 002-84686-07).
Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
These appeals are being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. After entering pleas of guilty, Appellant was convicted of resisting arrest or search and criminal trespass. Sentence was imposed in open court on December 5, 2007. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial in either case. Consequently, Appellant's notices of appeal were due on January 4, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after day sentence is imposed unless motion for new trial is timely filed). However, Appellant filed his notices of appeal on December 23, 2008. Along with the notices of appeal, Appellant filed a motion in each case requesting an extension of time to file his notice of appeal. An appellate court may grant such a motion if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files the notice in the trial court and files a motion in the appellate court complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. To be timely under Rule 26.3, Appellant must have filed his motions for extension of time on or before January 21, 2008. Because his motions were filed on December 23, 2008, they are untimely and must be overruled. Appellant's December 23, 2008 notices of appeal are untimely, which leaves us without jurisdiction over the appeals. SeeSlaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998) (per curiam); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Consequently, Appellant's motions for extension of time to file his notices of appeal are overruled, and these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.