From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Regents of University of Minnesota

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 28, 2010
Civ. No. 10-2146 (PAM/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-2146 (PAM/SRN).

June 28, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson, dated June 8, 2010. The Court must conduct a de novo review of all portions of a Magistrate Judge's R R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. L. R. 72.2(b). No objections have been filed in the time period permitted. Thus, this Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions in the R R (Docket No. 3).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Docket No. 2) is DENIED; and
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), this action is summarily DISMISSED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Russell v. Regents of University of Minnesota

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 28, 2010
Civ. No. 10-2146 (PAM/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 28, 2010)
Case details for

Russell v. Regents of University of Minnesota

Case Details

Full title:Joshua James Russell, Plaintiff, v. Regents of the University of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 28, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 10-2146 (PAM/SRN) (D. Minn. Jun. 28, 2010)