From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Marshal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
CV 10-6370-GAF(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion


DONALD NELSON RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHAL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-6370-GAF(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 19, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Second Amended Petition without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Russell v. Marshal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
CV 10-6370-GAF(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Russell v. Marshal

Case Details

Full title:DONALD NELSON RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHAL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

CV 10-6370-GAF(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)