From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Davis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Apr 4, 2011
CV 07-3692 TJH (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion


DOUGLAS T. RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. GRAY DAVIS, et al., Respondents. No. CV 07-3692 TJH (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. April 4, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          TERRY J. HATTER Jr., District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Russell v. Davis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Apr 4, 2011
CV 07-3692 TJH (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Russell v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS T. RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. GRAY DAVIS, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

CV 07-3692 TJH (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Barnes v. Lane

No. CV 07-3692 TJH FFM, 2011 WL 1254559, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2011), report and recommendation adopted,…