From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. County of Butte

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
2:14-CV-00694-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          LAW OFFICES OF LARRY L. BAUMBACH Larry L. Baumbach Attorney for Plaintiff

          PORTER | SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Stephen E. Horan William E. Camy Attorneys for County of Butte

          LAW OFFICE OF DOUGLAS R. THORN Douglas R. Thorn Attorney for Town of Paradise


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT_

          Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

         Defendant COUNTY OF BUTTE, Defendant TOWN OF PARADISE, and Plaintiff DENISE RUSSELL by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. All parties have been working in good faith toward the resolution of this matter. The parties are contemplating mediation. A date for mediation has not been set but the parties intend to set a date for January or February of 2015.

2. Considering the parties are contemplating mediation, the parties stipulate to a continuance of the Motion to Amend from January 15, 2015 to February 26, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ORDER

         PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Russell v. County of Butte

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
2:14-CV-00694-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Russell v. County of Butte

Case Details

Full title:DENISE RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

2:14-CV-00694-TLN-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)