From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. City of Tupelo

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Nov 2, 2021
Civil Action 1:20-CV-3-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-CV-3-SA-DAS

11-02-2021

MICHAEL RUSSELL PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

SHARION AYCOCK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 1, 2021, the Defendants filed a Motion to Bifurcate [114]. In their Motion [114], the Defendants request that the Court “bifurcate the issue of punitive damages from the liability and compensatory damages phase of the upcoming jury trial of this matter[.]” [114] at p. 1. In his Response [115], Michael Russell states that he “agrees that the punitive damages issue should be bifurcated.” [115] at p. 1.

In pertinent part, Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

(b) Separate Trials. For convenience, to avoid prejudice, or to expedite and economize, the court may order a separate trial of one or more separate issues, claims, crossclaims, counterclaims, or third-party claims.
FED. R. CIV. P. 42(b).

Utilizing the discretion authorized by Rule 42(b), the Court will bifurcate the issue of punitive damages from the liability and compensatory damages phase of the trial of this matter. The Motion [114] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Russell v. City of Tupelo

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Nov 2, 2021
Civil Action 1:20-CV-3-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Russell v. City of Tupelo

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RUSSELL PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-CV-3-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Nov. 2, 2021)