From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rusolo v. Odyssey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 25, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

A motion to withdraw as counsel is an inappropriate means of testing the propriety of an insurance carrier's disclaimer of liability on the ground of lack of cooperation by the insured ( see, Brothers v. Burt, 27 N.Y.2d 905; Presley v. Williams, 57 A.D.2d 947; Monaghan v. Meade, 91 A.D.2d 1014). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rusolo v. Odyssey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Rusolo v. Odyssey

Case Details

Full title:LISA RUSOLO, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, ANN RUSOLO, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Pryer v. DeMatteis Organizations, Inc.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied, without prejudice to…

People v. Elrac, Inc.

" (Vincent C. Alexander, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Consol. Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR C321:2…