From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rushing v. Tampkins

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 10, 2022
5:21-01004 AB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-01004 AB (ADS)

01-10-2022

RAHMAN RASHAD RUSHING, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THE HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTÉ JR., United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Rahman R. Rushing, (Dkt. No. 7), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), (Dkt. No. 11). A review of the docket reflects Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline for doing so has passed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted, (Dkt. No. 11);

2. The case is dismissed with prejudice;

3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Rushing v. Tampkins

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 10, 2022
5:21-01004 AB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Rushing v. Tampkins

Case Details

Full title:RAHMAN RASHAD RUSHING, Plaintiff, v. CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

5:21-01004 AB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2022)