From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rushing v. Exeter Fin.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 18, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-1704-G-BT (N.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:22-CV-1704-G-BT

11-18-2022

MAE RUSHING, Plaintiff, v. EXETER FINANCE LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. JOE FISH, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated October 26, 2022. The court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error and has found none. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rushing v. Exeter Fin.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 18, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-1704-G-BT (N.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Rushing v. Exeter Fin.

Case Details

Full title:MAE RUSHING, Plaintiff, v. EXETER FINANCE LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:22-CV-1704-G-BT (N.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Burney v. Allen Auto.

But such allegations are insufficient because “the term ‘debt collector' specifically refers to those who are…